For the last several years, as I’ve tried to break into more “traditional” print syndication — I’ve had trouble with my established web–based publishing schedule. One editor suggested that I write a weekly horoscope that was generic enough to cover the whole period, that I leave out the references to timing. Of course, that presents a problem, and personally, I have difficulty with the accuracy at that. I write a Monday to Sunday column, covers the whole week. But an idea came up, during a deeply meditative state, I was wondering how well received a “weekend update” would be, say something that came out on Thursday? I’ve got a lot of “bit fiddling” to so, but I might try that this week. There’s another problem I’m running into this week. I answer as much of the e-mail as is humanly possible. And I try to be direct, honest, and give a valid astrological answer to questions. And yes, details do matter, and yes, I try to answer, but this week, I have been besieged with questions that can’t be answered in a single line or two. And I’ve gotten a fair number of requests for rather detailed answers. Relationship questions, impact of the celestial events on a single chart, questions of that ilk. Then, the person writing in, wonders why I can’t pause in my schedule, calculate the chart, do an analysis, and then write up a response — for free. Sounds pretty petty on my part, but if I stopped and did this for free for everyone, I’d be out of job. And I’ve discovered that free advice is worth every penny that was spent.
For the last several years
Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.
© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.
It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.