I was perusing several other horoscope sites on the web, and I noticed something that makes my place unique in what it offers. Depth. I found there was a lot of regurgitated text from old astrology “cookbooks,” a little bit of fairly arcane text which had precious little to do with reality, and most of the weekly scopes lacked depth. I figure my scopes are currently running well over a hundred words per week, and the other ones seem to be a little shallow by comparison. Then there were the daily scopes. One caught my eye and gave me a good chuckle, and an idea. For Sag, it said, “The moon is in Sag, the sun is in Leo, today is a great day….” Then, for Gemini, it started out, “The moon is in Sag, the sun is in Leo, today is a great day….” I wonder if I could away with using the same horoscope for two signs on the opposite side of the zodiac? Better yet, I could just write one horoscope and have it apply to all the signs? Just copy and paste 12 times over. Then I signed up for a few free readings. Now I know I’m ahead of the pack. The typical “reading” was a computer generated text which didn’t have more than a hundred words in it. Compared with the “free lunch” offer on astrofish.net, and compared with possible trivia prizes, this place looks better and better all the time.
several other horoscope sites
Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.
© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.
It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.