Obviously, I’ve been reading another Shakespeare biography, it’s at once tough and interesting, to me. But I doubt it would have serious appeal to the masses. But what do I know?
I was collecting material for upcoming plays, and I came across a couple of useful notations. What I’m enjoying the most, though, is the fact that conjecture is clearly labeled as such.
“It has often been proved, however, that behind the most fanciful account there lies a substratum of truth.” (page 52)
Peter Ackroyd’s (exhaustive) Shakespeare: The Biography
Too true.
“What we call creative writing, the Elizabethans called rhetoric.” (page 61)
Peter Ackroyd’s Shakespeare: The Biography
Good to note when referring to “rhetoric” then and now.
“In true sixteenth-century fashion the dry account of receipts and payments is interrupted by notations on magical spells and astrological matters.” (page 135)
Peter Ackroyd’s Shakespeare: The Biography
Which, is one reason I’ve ben so fascinated with the canon. Plus the jokes.
But, I’d hardly recommend this book until it gets into paperback. Except, of course, for the players and scholars. As such, it’s an excellent text, but not casual, or light, reading. English history and drama, and a lot of conjecture about the missing years – so far.
One of the points about the book that I really like? Something like ninety chapters divided over three or four sections, so it’s easy to read. Sort of. But I’m not even halfway through it.
Laeti edimus qui nos subigant!
(click to visit)
Playlist:
Johnny Cash (his version The Wanderer is haunting me.)
Thelonious Monk
Strauss
Hank III
Rev. Horton Heat
