Shape & Flavor

The unmitigated joy of a public journal is the opportunity to opine with no factual basis at all. Recollections, as it were. In part, I was raised in the shadow of the Dr. Pepper plant, a delightful deco sculpture of a building that is no longer there. Sad waste, but then places like that, for all the beauty, they get plowed under for a new crop of fresh hell.

Progress marches on.

The original Coke ™ Bottle Shape, I’m sure that’s been covered by some kind of analysis, but that original shape was, still is, influential. Personally, I was introduced to the tall – at the time – slender and straight bottles of Dr. Pepper with the circular 10-2-4 logo. I liked that. Liked the product, in all it’s flavorful, sugary, syrupy, carbonated goodness. It was a tall bottle, to me, and while it was a straight container, it lacked the graceful and refined curves of a Coca-Cola branded shape, the stuff inside was a little better. Sweeter, to me. Turns out, one of the “secret ingredients” was, is, prune juice. Plus a secret blend of eleven herbs and spices.

In the icebox here, there’s half a case of water in bottles, a couple of sparkling bottles of water, a few Mexican cokes (Coca-Cola from Mexican bottlers), and part of a six pack of Dublin Dr. Pepper.

Side-by-side comparison? That Dr. Pepper still tastes better. However, side-by-side comparison? The Coke bottle is way more attractive.

Vote:

Really, I drink so little coke these days it doesn’t matter. I prefer fresh-squeezed coffee. Stronger is bitter. Stronger is better, too.

(And you, gentle reader, thought I had destination?)

“The unique color and shape of the classic 6 1/2-ounce green Coca-Cola bottle is protected under trademark law.”
How to Make Big Money in your own Small Business. Fox, Jeffery. NY: Hyperion Press, 2004. Page 88.

About the author: Born and raised in a small town in East Texas, Kramer Wetzel spent years honing his craft in a trailer park in South Austin. He hates writing about himself in third person. More at KramerWetzel.com.

Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.

© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.

It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.

  • ssmith04 Feb 4, 2009 @ 9:24

    clearly, you’re just grazing…

Next post:

Previous post: