Bad images

I love this one for the sake of its bad quality as opposed to clarity and color in a better exposure. The purple is washed out in places, and sometimes, the color saturation is too high. I’m sure a Photoshop whiz could clean this up with filters and pixel/hues.

Equipment was probably a “point and click” digital camera with either 2, 4 or 8 megapixels capacity. I don’t know as I go through a lot of cameras. I suppose I could look it up, but that’s half the fun, seeing what rolls up every morning, or evening, and sometimes, in its badness is goodness.

Or not. All subjective and in the eyes of the beholder.

Two days later, another, similar type of image popped up.

It’s that very “bad quality” that I like so well.

Unrelated & upcoming:
Pre-orders taken NOW!

About the author: Born and raised in a small town in East Texas, Kramer Wetzel spent years honing his craft in a trailer park in South Austin. He hates writing about himself in third person. More at KramerWetzel.com.

Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.

© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.

It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.

Next post:

Previous post: