A ruling by a south Texas magistrate judge suggests that cell tower transmissions are covered with the constitution.
Okay, which part is stranger, not an Austin judge where the intellectual property rights are so important? Or it was a magistrate judge? Or that it’s a British publication that picked up the story, I mean which part of the story is the oddest?
About the author:
Born and raised in a small town in East Texas, Kramer Wetzel spent years honing his craft in a trailer park in South Austin. He hates writing about himself in third person. More at KramerWetzel.com.
Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.
