As of now, I’ve studied for two years with several “information marketing” (self-styled) experts. Some good, some more fluff than actual content, some distilled recommendations include the obvious — astrofish.net.
About the third line down, there’s a tear sheet PDF, just a resource list, and it only includes resources I’ve found that work, and personal recommendations are serious only because I’ve found them to work well.
What’s fun, in some areas, I’ve got an information product in my horoscopes, what’s fun for me, I break many of the rules, yet, by the same ‘experts,’ my straight statistics are off the chart — in a good way.
What makes my material different?
Gentle yet persistent rule breaking.
Choose empirical evidence over “learned” commentary.
In short?
Experimental & Experiential.
Another perfect example.
Works for me. I find your insights and advice to be fresh, original, and right on the money. Never fishy. Well, almost never. Let me not to a marriage of insight and verbosity admit impediments.