Readers and MiniFlux.net

Readers and MiniFlux.net
Over the years, I’ve “run my own server,” as it were, and like many, my routine online reading was upset when Google stopped their RSS aggregator. In my serendipitous way, I stumbled across more Readers and Miniflux.net.

miniflux dot net

While still in my early testing phase, for anyone who runs a site, or has a site, and wants an easy-to-install, easy to manage RSS reader? This is it.

Problem one: I stumbled across this when Mercury was retrograde, so I’m suspicious.

“Data is suspect,” as I would be inclined to say. However, the premise and promise is good. Installation was as easy as promised.

Previously, I’ve had a number of errors with my former favorite, “REEDER,” and then, as I ported all the feeds I follow over to Feedly, again, a promising-looking solution, the interaction between devices just doesn’t work correctly.

It’s a simple program, which is all I want. My feeds in one place. Does that. Doesn’t provide categories or striations and doesn’t make “recommendations,” which, frankly, are usually annoying since I have varied tastes.

I find a food site I like, I follow its feed. I find news I like, I follow the feed. Blog I like? You know the drill.

Back to the original answer, doesn’t matter what device I access it from, phone, tablet, laptop, desktop, data stays in sync.

Readers and MiniFlux.net

Some days, simpler is better. That was the original premise, too, Really Simple Syndication, RSS.

Books — astrofish.net/books are now available in Austin, at Nature’s Treasures. See listings for details and location.

astrology chart

About the author: Born and raised in a small town in East Texas, Kramer Wetzel spent years honing his craft in a trailer park in South Austin. He hates writing about himself in third person. More at KramerWetzel.com.

Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.

© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.

It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.

  • Rhubarb Jul 23, 2013 @ 9:55

    Yes, simpler and straightforward is better. Except when you’re spelling “Cambridge” in which case it’s best to add an extra hump onto the letter, making the “n” and “m” IMHO.

    I use Blogline as my aggregator. Works OK but still more clicks required than absolutely necessary.

    So the new Royal has a Grand Trine in water? And all that stuff in Cancer!

Next post:

Previous post: