Thirteen Degrees

Started with a single astrology chart, a client had a significant element at Thirteen Degree of Pisces. Recently, as an adjunct, more for myself, I’ve gotten in the habit of writing down the planets and their locations, before I head into work. That’s an example from last month, because I can’t seem to locate the current sheets I used. (They’re in the work bag, never mind.) What did jump out, though, and seen there, Saturn (retrograde) at 15° Pisces, eventually grinding to a stop, almost a month later, around 13° Pisces. Grinding. Stop. Operative phrases.

Thirteen Degrees

This shows up, to a lesser or greater degree, across all the mutable elements in charts. It’s a point where Saturn passed before, so we all recall its passage. It’s just behind the middle of the mutable signs that the saturnine pressure produces problems. So look at a birth chart, and look to see what’s 12° to 15° of either Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius, or Pisces. Saturn conjunct the Pisces points. Saturn oppose the Virgo points. Saturn square the Gemini and Sagittarius pieces.

And now, a word about the middle of the 1960s? In 1965-6, Pluto and Uranus were at 14° and 15° of Virgo, a generational aspect, hitherto unseen for half a millennia. Saturn aligned with that some years back.

In May, 2009, just from a casual backwards glance, Saturn was stationary at 15° Virgo, that point so prevalent in all the charts of the Middle Sixties. Then, again, it was in Sagittarius, and that was tension angle to the point, March to May, 2016. Just data points. What it means? It’s recurrent patterns and tests, usually, for most of us, a test to see where we are, what has happened, and what is happening, in the immediate future. It’s that point, been ground down before, and now? Gets another pass.

Thirteen Degrees

The most common theme, to me?

“I fixed that already.”

Then there is nothing to fear. However, if it was sloppy job, a quick fix, or just “band-aid on the problem?” Might be an issue. “Crap. Thought I fixed that.”

Kramer Wetzel’s little book of transits

Common Sense Clause

A portion of a recent waiver:

1. I acknowledge and fully understand that the above-named person will be engaging in activities on the Premises that may involve risk of serious or permanent injury, death, or damage to personal property, including pets, which could result from the person’s own actions, inactions, or negligence, or from the actions, inactions, or negligence of others, or from conditions of the Premises, conditions of the weather, conditions of the landscape, or inherent dangers involved in activities on the Premises. Further, I acknowledge that there may be other risks not known or not reasonably foreseeable at this time, including but not limited to:

a. Latent or apparent defects in the dock; b. Acts of other people at the dock; c. Acts of, behaviors of, or reactions to animals at the dock d. The tenant / dock entrant’s physical or mental condition; e. Failure to adhere to applicable rules; f. Failure to adhere to common sense; g. Provision of emergency treatment or services from any party, related or unrelated to astrofish.net.

Common Sense Clause

That’s what’s lacking in so much these days, the common sense clause.

Failure to adhere to common sense.

Failure to adhere to common sense.

Common Sense Clause