Statement on the Use of AI on this site
Statement on the Use of AI on
this site.
To eschew obvious obfuscation and to make the
fine print more legally legible?
I don’t use iterative, reiterative, large language model, generative, or regenerative software to write or rewrite the material on this site. No
AI.
There are two parts to this. “AI” gained notice in 2018, and a tech-buddy urged me to include a chat-bot box on my site. He demonstrated one, suggested it would make my life easier, and what it did? The “bot” would scan the text and formulate a quick answer.
That was seven or eight years back. I passed on the “as a test and greatest in web technology” because I have no need to be at the bleeding edge, not any longer. I like simple.
But digging back even further, I’ve long since tried to make the page look less “digital,” and to include a handwritten portion with everything else. The various glyphs and headers I’ve employed? A testament to that.
The
new horoscopes rolled over, and that is automated to a certain extent, but that’s also simple website technology, not terribly complex, and certainly no software agent or AI is running that. I suspected my sites are scraped, but there’s nothing I can be done about that.
So the typographical mistakes, grammar problems, holes in logic? Those point to me as the author, not AI.
The hand-drawn, handwritten headers and glyphs? Again points to there just being me in charge.
Statement on the Use of AI on this site
Finally, a tiny comment leftover from rudimentary early works?
“Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.”
(Pablo Picasso)
Excerpt From
Pink Cake: The Quote Collection
Pink Cake
Pink Cake: The Quote Collection
Pink Cake: A Commonplace Book
