Sure, doing book reviews was a cheap shot, but it was brought about because I got to spend some time with a former literature professor, and it was good to see the old teacher even though he gave me a gentle chiding about gradual school and getting into another Master’s plan someplace. Then the discursive subject matter wheeled around literature, and I pretty much lost one point about how a movie, or similar passive entertainment, can be construed as literature. The only film that I could think of that really left a lasting imprint, one with great impact, in the past few year, the only example I could really come up with was “Pulp Fiction.” Of course, I could also cite several books that I was reading recently, pieces of work which excited me, even to the point that I sat down and wrote something about them. That’s the difference between reading and watching, passive versus active.
see the old teacher
Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.
© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.
It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.