In Our Likeness

In Our Likeness

The algorithm thus spaketh?

No, wait, “Thus Spake the Algorithm?”

Late nights will do this.

In Our Likeness

The nice aspect to my age? I did stupid things before there was a cell phone — or social media — to record my actions. No cringe photos; just unreliable first-person narratives that can be easily denied with no corroborating evidence.

Leads to the questions in the design of the novel’s premise, about sentient AI, and the god-like powers we attribute to machines.

Not without historical perspective, deos ex machina1, as we would say?

On the screen one night, late night, Mark Cuban was talking about a large language model, and then it started to make sense.

“Who can? Reality is a client-side application.” Page 199.

My own canon of work — three decades or more — of horoscopes — that provides a way to plot learning, and a curve, a large language model, or just a snap shot inside some of my thinking. The episodic, periodic, gradual accretion of data shapes the learning. Bonus: having a long a timeline of sorts.

Double-bonus: grammar has improved.

In Our Likeness

Thoroughly character driven.

“There was a new connection between us, the only two sane people left in a world rapidly losing its mind.” Page 160.

There is that.

Love story between nerds?

“Who can? Reality is a client-side application.” Page 199.

It is.

In Our Likeness

  1. “You mean, ’deus ex machina’ don’t you?”

    Comment stands, that’s “gods in the machine.” Plural. Figure it out.

About the author: Born and raised in a small town in East Texas, Kramer Wetzel spent years honing his craft in a trailer park in South Austin. He hates writing about himself in third person. More at KramerWetzel.com.

Use of this site (you are here) is covered by all the terms as defined in the fineprint, reply via e-mail.

© 1993 – 2024 Kramer Wetzel, for astrofish.net &c. astrofish.net: breaking horoscopes since 1993.

It’s simple, and free: subscribe here.